Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 597
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 7-13

A randomized comparative study between Airtraq and Mccoy for intubation in patients with cervical spine injury


1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
2 Department of Anaesthesia, Medanta, Gurgaon, Haryana, India

Correspondence Address:
Srilata Moningi
Flat No. G-3, Sujatha Sterling Homes, H. No. 8-2-403/A, Road No. 4, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 500 082, Telangana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2394-6954.190768

Rights and Permissions

Background: This study was done to compare Airtraq and McCoy for intubation characteristics and hemodynamic parameters following endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery. Materials and Methods: After Institutional Ethical Committee approval, a prospective randomized comparative study was designed on forty American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II patients involving single level ACDF surgery. Following standard anesthesia protocol and manual in-line stabilization applied along with a cervical collar or pin traction for immobilization, tracheal intubation was performed either with Airtraq or McCoy. The time taken for intubation, intubation difficulty score (IDS), comfort grading, and hemodynamic parameters were noted following intubation. The categorical data were compared using Chi-square test and the continuous variables were compared between the groups using paired sample t-test. Repeated ANOVA was tested for hemodynamic data at each measurement time point and Tukey post hoc was used for within the group comparisons at different timings following intubation. Results: The mean intubation time was 24.41 ± 14.8 s in Airtraq group (Group A) which was statistically significant compared to McCoy group (Group M) 38.96 ± 15.55 s (P = 0.001). The IDS and comfort grading was statistically significant in Group A compared to Group M. The changes in hemodynamic vitals following intubation were comparable in both the groups. Conclusion: Airtraq improves the grade of glottic visualization with minimal assistance. It also minimized the time taken for intubation had stable hemodynamics with increased comfort to the anesthetist.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1452    
    Printed83    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded164    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal